Cardiff Cycling Strategy 2016-2026 – Deep Dive Part 2 – Primary Route East-West

In our previous post we talked about the Council’s strategy for delivering improvements to its cycle network. As part of that strategy there are two new “primary routes” to talk about, one travelling east to west and the other north to south.

There are also longer-term improvements planned to the original Enfys routes, but we’ll get to those in future posts. In this post we’re going to go straight to the most interesting and ambitious project of all –the east-west primary route.

Section 1 – Plasnewydd to St Mellons


Linking the city centre with the new proposed development at the eastern edge of Cardiff, much of this section concerns Newport Road from where it meets Queen Street, Dumfries Place and Station Terrace, all the way to Cypress Drive in St Mellons.

Let’s address this straight off the bat. If you look very carefully, Queen Street has a big purple line through it on this map and it does appear that the council plans to allow cycling on Queen Street. It’ll be nice to finally put this issue to bed once and for all.

Heading east from Queen Street, the council appears to have two options on the table for a number of sections along this road. One option for the section west of Fitzalan Place is to install cycle lanes within both east and westbound bus lanes –which sounds distinctly dodgy; or it will remove one or both bus lanes and install a segregated cycle track alongside the road, separated from pedestrians. That sounds more like it.

However, further up beyond Glossop Road (EW26) the plan is to install a cycle lane within the eastbound bus lane and install a cycle track on the westbound carriageway. That should answer the question of what it plans to do in that first section (EW28a) –it should be the same. It shouldn’t look like it was planned in a piecemeal fashion, even if it was to be installed that way.

At Clifton Street the route splits from Newport Road to head down Broadway, where it will either be converted into a one-way street with a parking-protected bike lane (cynically known as a door-zone cycle lane with no room to swerve out of the way…); or it’ll be converted to a ‘Bicycle Street’.

Where it rejoins Newport Road they are planning a two-way segregated cycle way along the east side, as well as a redesigned junction at TGI Friday to make it slightly less hateful to access Rover Way.

The roundabout at Currys is also for the chop, to be replaced by traffic lights with phasing for cycle crossing. On the subject of roundabouts, there’s more good news as they plan to either provide a “high quality transition” between the segregated cycle lanes and off-road provision, or even install an additional cycle bridge across the Rumney river.

The remaining section through Llanrumney is a mixture of light segregation and signal upgrades until Cypress Drive, where there will be a two-way segregated cycle track.

Section 2 – Stuttgarter Strasse to Fairwater


Whilst Queen Street is on the map as a cycle route here, it isn’t the primary route. It actually takes you around Stuttgarter Strasse where three options are being considered:

  1. Install cycle track alongside road, separate from pedestrians
  2. One existing westbound traffic lane to be converted to two-way cycle track alongside road, separated from pedestrians
  3. Further improve existing off-road cycle track –shared path, in other words.

We’ll have number 2 please!

The route then heads past the Hilton, onto the Kingsway and along Castle Street. There’s a two-way segregated track planned for this part. Good!

After crossing the Taff, a junction redesign is planned to allow you to turn right, up the Taff Trail to Sophia Gardens where you’ll follow the road to the stables and the A48. However, they plan to remove the speed bumps, mercifully. Some lighting would be good here too, but it isn’t mentioned…

At the end of the road, there’s a left past the WJEC where an upgraded crossing will be waiting. The currently narrow path on the other side will be upgraded and separation from pedestrians provided. Then, up the steep hill by the Cathedral, take a right along Bridge Street and a set of lights will be waiting. Currently you have to wait for a safe gap to pull out if you are turning right, which isn’t a lot of fun and can take an age when it’s busy, so that’s good. There will also be signals where the roundabout is now, taking much of the guesswork out of the equation.

On Llantrisant Road there are three options planned.

  1. Install cycle tracks using grass verges to provide necessary width, with priority for cyclists at side roads.
  2. Remove centre line and install wide advisory lanes (like Colum Road & James Street) – No thanks!
  3. Install off-road cycle track on one side with appropriate crossings at each end.

None of these options are ideal, given the width of this road (seriously, it’s huge), but on balance, perhaps option 1.


At the roundabout you leave Llantrisant Road and head onto what looks like an old railway line that snakes through the two proposed developments all the way to Creigiau. This is something we’re quite excited about –it’s segregated all the way and oh so straight, as old railway lines are.


Apart from the options presented for Llantrisant Road, which are a bit disappointing, there’s a lot to like here. We’re particularly excited by the upgrade of the old railway line to Creigiau.

Having a two-way track past the castle will also be very helpful. However, implementation is going to be interesting. It’s going to be like one of those puzzles that look like very little until the last piece is in place. Even so, they’ve set a 2020 finish for this, so it’s not too long to wait in the grand scheme of things.

However, we’d love to know what you think about this east-west route. Let us know in the comments. Would you make any changes to it, because you know, there’s still time…

Part 3…

10 thoughts on “Cardiff Cycling Strategy 2016-2026 – Deep Dive Part 2 – Primary Route East-West

Add yours

  1. I only really know the central bit. Very good news about Stuttgarter Strasse to Castle St section. I go for no 2 as well. Will this involve changing the cycle lanes on Bridge St as well? It drives me nuts how many people cycle the wrong way along both parts, but hopefully this change will sort that out.
    Good news about removing the bumps, but how will they manage cars on this section? Or are they just assuming that because the road doesn’t go anywhere, this won’t be a problem?
    That shared route from Western Ave to Llandaff is very narrow. It will be interesting to see how they manage that – unless they widen the route which would be great.
    A spur off this I use a lot is Mill Lane, which is another nightmare of a shared route to Llandaff Road. I can’t work out from this map if it is included, but really something needs to be done. It is used regularly by cyclists and pedestrians – especially students on their way to the bus stop. I have written to the Council about it and commented whenever I have the chance, but no joy… any views would be welcome 😉


  2. You’re having a laff if you seriously think closing one of two lanes in either direction on Stuttgarter Strasse is helpful to the city as a whole. So much land around this strip to create a cycle highway away from the road. These plans will involve compromise but surely the plan is to improve cycling infrastructure without directly screwing over motorists? Unlike the extremists many of us do all four things regularly – walk, cycle, drive, take PT, so I say this as someone who sees all sides of the equation. Generally I prefer integrated cycling which forces traffic to slow down and behave but I realise that to get less confident people onto bikes and to stop them from dying we need dedicated lanes – but to do this in a city that has fecked up traffic flow so abysmally (and not to the benefit of anyone bar the wandering pedestrian) it may be more a case of re-assigning sections of pedestrian areas (Queen St) and paths (along Stuttgarter) rather than nobbling the much maligned motorist.


    1. Actually, Mike, the aim for the council is modal shift away from the car. So, the council can and should allocate space away from the car and give some back to people, including cyclists and wandering pedestrians.


  3. Gavin – you’re misled: they talk of modal shift, but even the 50:50 target with the increased population etc. means **increased** traffic (+30%). Cdf Council could take space from city centre roads, but their priority is to continue city-centre car parking (even increase it) so they need city-centre road space to accommodate all the central cars queuing for car parking in congested streets – like Westgate St where they jam up the buses.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a website or blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: